This miscellaneous application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear on the dates of hearing to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.148 of 1992 ====================================================== Md.Ibrahim & Ors .... .... Petitioners. Versus Bibi Zainab & Ors .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : None. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------ 11 03-02-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application when the case is called out. Yesterday (02.02.2015) also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this application when the case was called out. As a result, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U
Md. Ibrahim & Ors
Bibi Zainab & Ors
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
