Dismissed

Ghanshyam Jha and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 Aug 2015CWJC/9495/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a writ petition seeking immediate regularization on higher posts. It refused interference in the impugned 2006 order but allowed petitioners to claim prospective benefits under a 2013 resolution, subject to constitutional principles of Articles 14 and 16.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of; petitioners enabled to claim prospective benefits under 2013 resolution subject to Articles 14 and 16.

Ghanshyam Jha and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9495 of 2008

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ghanshyam Jha son of late Krishna Ballabh Jha, resident of Village + P.O. + P.S. Bangaon, District- Saharsa.

¶5

Rajendra Jha, son of late Baidyanath Jha, resident of Village + P.O. Rahua (Tusiyahi), P.S.- Bihra, District- Saharsa.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Chief Engineer-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

¶12

Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Public Health Division, Saharsa.

¶13

.... .... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Karandeep Kuamr, AC to GP 04

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

4 10-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

While this Court is not inclined to interfere with the

¶18

impugned order or the relief sought in this writ application reading as follows:

¶19

"1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter dt. 7.12.2006 issued by respondent Executive Engineer by which service of the petitioners have been regularised on the IVth grade post whereas petitioners were worked in the 3rd grade post as work Sarkar since 1980 in pursuance of the letter issued by the respondents and further issued direction to the respondent for regularized the service of petitioners on the post of work sarkar on the ground since date of appointment of the Master Role (in the year 1980) to till date of issuance of order impugned they were working in the 3rd grade post

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.9495 of 2008 (4) dt.10-08-2015

¶21

2/2

¶22

and further issued direction to respondents affirmed the letter dt. 24.1.1996 issued by the respondent no. 3 by which services of the petitioner on the post of work Sarkar had regularized and further give other legal consequential benefit attached to the post.",

¶23

only on the basis that subsequently, the Government, vide its resolution dated 17.10.2013, has taken a decision for regularising such work charge employees by creating shadow post in regular establishment till their continuation in service inasmuch as this provision was definitely not there when the impugned order was passed on 7.12.2006.

¶24

Nothing said in this order, however, shall come in the way of the petitioners in representing their case before the competent authority for at least giving them the prospective benefit of the aforementioned government decision contained in resolution dated 17.10.2013. This Court, however, immediately must clarify that whatever decision is taken with regard to petitioners must be based on the principles of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and in accordance with law.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of.

¶26

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

Sujit/-

¶28

Ghanshyam Jha and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Jha and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jata Shankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kailash Thakur Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Kashi Nath Mishra Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Kashi Nath Mishra Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.