Disposed

Madhuri Devi and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jan 2015CWJC/9251/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding General Provident Fund dues, the High Court disposed of the matter after respondent authorities filed a counter affidavit and handed over a bankers cheque for the remaining amount with interest. The court allowed the petitioners to seek redress for any computation errors via a specific representation process.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of. Petitioners are allowed to file a representation regarding computational errors or remaining claims within four weeks for a reasoned order.

Madhuri Devi and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9251 of 2008

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Madhuri Devi Wife of Late Surendra Jha.

¶5

Suman Shekhar Son of Late Surendra Jha.

¶6

Both are resident of Village- Kalwari, P.S. Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Director-in-Chief, Directorate of Health and Family Welfare, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶10

Regional Dy. Director of Health, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.

¶11

The Accountant General Bihar and Jharkhand, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna.

¶12

Director, Directorate of Provident Fund, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bhawan, Patna.

¶13

District Provident Fund Officer, Bhagalpur.

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶16

=====================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

6. 23.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 3 as well as respondent no. 5. As per the stand in the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 3, the remaining amount of G.P.F. along with interest comes to Rs. 2,65,577/- for which a bankers cheque has been brought by learned counsel for the State in favour of petitioner no. 1 and the same has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid, this Court does not deem it necessary to keep the matter pending and accordingly,

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.9251 of 2008 (6) dt.23-01-2015

¶23

2/2

¶24

the writ petition stands disposed off.

¶25

However, if the petitioners find that there has been any error in either computation or still something remains, they shall be at liberty to file a representation before respondent no. 3, giving full details of their remaining claims. If such a representation is filed within four weeks from today along with a copy of this order, the concerned respondent shall look into it and pass a reasoned order within three weeks thereafter. If anything further is required to be paid in terms of the decision taken on the representation filed by the petitioners, the same shall also be done within the next three weeks.

¶26

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶27

P. Kumar

¶28

Madhuri Devi and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhuri Devi and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalan Thakur Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Lakshmishwar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Bachandeo Thakur Vs the Bihar State Electricity Bo

Lal Mohan Das Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Karan Sahni Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Madhumala Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.