Disposed

Bachandeo Thakur v. the Bihar State Electricity Bo

Patna HC22 Jan 2015CWJC/19706/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order where the petitioner, a retired Messenger, sought payment of outstanding gratuity. Due to non-appearance of respondents, the court directed the Chairman to pay the remaining Rs. 44,288/- within two weeks and granted entitlement to statutory interest.

What did the court decide?

Director the Chairman of respondent No.1 to pay the remaining gratuity of Rs. 44,288/- within two weeks and grant statutory interest.

Bachandeo Thakur Vs the Bihar State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19706 of 2011

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bachandeo Thakur, aged about 61 years Retired Messenger Barauni Therma Power Station Son of Late Rameshwar Thakur Resident of VillageDahiyarasalpur, P.O.- Dahiya, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The Bihar State Electricity Board (Now Holding Company) through its Chairman Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶8

1. The Secretary Bihar State Electricity Board, (Now Holding Company), Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶9

1. The Director, Terminal Benefit Bihar State Electricity Board (Now Holding Company), Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶10

1. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer Barauni Thermal Power Station, Begusarai.

¶11

1. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Barauni Thermal Power Station, Begusrarai. .... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶13

=====================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

4. 22.01.2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Nobody appears on behalf of the respondents.

¶17

From Annexure-A of the supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it appears that after revision, the petitioner is entitled to gratuity of Rs. 1,26,621/- out of which Rs. 82,333/- has been paid and for the payment of the remaining amount of Rs. 44,288/-, the process has been initiated. However, today learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this amount has not yet been received by him.

¶18

As nobody is appearing on behalf of

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.19706 of 2011 (4) dt.22-01-2015

¶20

2/2

¶21

respondents, the application stands disposed off with a direction to the Chairman, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited to ensure that the remaining amount of Rs. 44,288/- is paid to the petitioner, if not already paid within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall also be entitled to interest, if any, in accordance with law as provided under the relevant statute(s).

¶22

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶23

P. Kumar

¶24

Bachandeo Thakur v. the Bihar State Electricity Bo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachandeo Thakur v. the Bihar State Electricity Bo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahmad Raza Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Surya Nath Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Pratibha Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Damodar Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Lakshmishwar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.