Satya Ranjan Das and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-paragraph oral order stating the writ petition is infructuous. The court provided no reasoning or substantive direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9047 of 2012
=========================================================== 1. Satya Ranjan Das Son Of Late Man Mohan Das Resident Of-Naya Bazar, P.O.Jugsalai, P.S.-Jugsalai, Jamsedpur, Jharkhand
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR JHA For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K.SHARMA, GA 1
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 20-03-2015
Writ has become infructuous as stated by counsel for the
petitioner.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
U
Satya Ranjan Das
Ravindra Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court