Disposed
Alok Kumar Yadav v. the Union of India and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/7398/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7398 of 2012
=========================================================== 1. Alok Kumar Yadav Son Of Babu Ram Yadav Resident Of Village And P.O. Patam, P.S. Naya Ramnagar, District - Munger .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union Of India Through Director General, Railway Protection Force, Government Of India, Ministry Of Railway, New Delhi 2. The Director General , Railway Protection Force, Govt. Of India, Ministry Of Railway, New Delhi 3. Inspector General, Railway Protection Special Force, New Delhi 4. Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, 11 Bn/Rpsf/Ghz Head Quarter, Rpsi Garhara Barauni, Bihar 5. Assistant Secutiry Commissioner/Adjutant/12bn Rpsf/Thakurli/Mumbai 6. Deputy Secretary/Abe Railway Board, New Delhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kunal Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-03-2015 Writ has become infructuous as stated by counsel for the petitioner. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk
U
Alok Kumar Yadav
The Union Of India
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court