The petitioner failed to appear on call. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, noting a prior dismissal on the same ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7818 of 2008 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Pramod Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Bank of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushlendra Kr.Sinha |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 5. |
30-03-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioner. |
| Learned counsel for respondent/State Bank of India is present. It appears that earlier also, this petition was dismissed due to non- prosecution. Again, the petition stands dismissed due to non- prosecution. |
|
| (Rakesh Kumar, J.) | |
| Anay/- U |
Pramod Ram
The State Bank of India
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
