The High Court at Patna dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking positive orders against State authorities regarding the Provident Fund Directorate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7448 of 2008
======================================================
Uday Kant Jha son of Late Kusheshwar Jha resident of Village – Damodarpur, Police Station Benipatti, District Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director, Provident Find Directorate, Govt. of Bihar Pant Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Joint Commissioner (Account Administration) Provident Fund Directorate Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 4. The Commissioner and Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani. 6. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad For the Respondent/s : A.C. to G.A.-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4. 27-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate – 5. In view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, I do not find any ground to pass any positive order in favour of petitioner.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay/-
U
Uday Kant Jha
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
