This is a non-substantive oral order in a civil writ petition. The petitioner failed to appear, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7589 of 2008
======================================================
Md. Mansoor
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Respondent/s : AC to GP 3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 26-03-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner,
either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment.
Learned AC to GP No. 3 by way of referring to the averments
made in the counter affidavit submits that the grievances raised in
the writ petition has already been redressed.
Be that as it may, since none has appeared on behalf of
the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed due to non –
prosecution.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
U
Md. Mansoor
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
