Civil Writ Jurisdiction case dismissed because the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the petition by submitting that it was no longer being pressed in view of changed circumstances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6970 of 2008 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, son of Ram Prasad Yadav, Village- Jageer, P.S. Kusakanta, District-Araria .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna 3. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mr. Pawan Kumar Mr. Amiya Kunal |
|
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER ........................ |
|
| 2 |
12-03-2015 In presence of Sri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for |
| Bihar Staff Selection Commission as well as learned State Counsel, it was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of changed circumstances, he does not want to press this writ petition. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| NKS/- U |
(Rakesh Kumar, J) |
Ranjeet Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna
The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
