Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Kumar passed an oral order dismissing the entire writ petition due to the prior dismissal concerning respondent nos. 5 to 7.
Disposal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6472 of 2006
======================================================
1. Rameshwar Prasad Sah S/o late Tanuk Lal Sah
2. Tribhuwan Prasad Sah, S/o Mouzilal Sah
Both residents of village Simarbani, P.S. Bhargama, Distt. Araria.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Collector, Purnea
3. Dy. Collector, Land Reforms, Forbisganj, Distt. Purnea
4. Anchal Adhikari, Bhargawan, Distt. Araria.
……..Respondents 1 st Party
5. Binod Kumar Mandal
6. Rajendra Mandal
7. Jai Prakash Mandal, all 5 to 7 S/o late Krityanand Mandal, residents
of village Simarbani, P.S. Bhargama, distt. Araria.
.... .... Respondents 2 nd Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunath Kumar
Mr. Uma Kant Tiwary
For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Jha, AC to GA-13
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6. 12-03-2015 In view of dismissal of the writ petition in respect of respondent no. 5 to 7, the entire writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay/-
U
Rameshwar Prasad Sah
Tribhuwan Prasad Sah
The State of Bihar
Collector, Purnea
Dy. Collector, Land Reforms, Forbisganj
Anchal Adhikari, Bhargawan
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
