petitioner herself requested the District Magistrate vide communication dated 28.12.2014 (Annexure-G series) for shifting of the female inmates of the SSH to another SSH as she was unable to shoulder the responsibility in the circumstances detailed therein relating to these incidents several representations were filed by the petitioner society, It is not, therefore, a case where the action under challenge is taken as a surprise to the petitioner. In such matter, nonissuance of a notice prior to action, in my view, shall be of not much consequence. Indisputably, the petitioner was running the Help Line/SSH since last several preceding years. Obviously, this was on the basis of office order and not agreement as claimed by the petitioner. In such view of the matter, the withdrawal of the office order resulting in the impugned action cannot be said to be wholly arbitrary or unjustified, particularly, when the matter relates to safe handling of human beings who are either destitute(s) or sufferer of the onslaught of the society and the corresponding duty on the State.
