The court dismissed the writ application due to the petitioners' lack of interest and failure to appear with representation after a significant period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5916 of 1999
======================================================
Sri Krishna Murari Pd.-1 &Ors
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Singh, AC to GP 30
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI
SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
6 24-04-2015 Today also there is no representation on behalf of the
petitioners. Learned counsel for the State is present.
It seems that with passage of time the petitioners have
lost interest in the matter.
This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
BKS/-
U
Sri Krishna Murari Pd.-1 & Ors
The State of Bihar & Ors
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
