Single judge corrected a clerical error regarding the disposal of the writ petition and an interim application (IA) recorded in an earlier order.
The writ petition is to be treated as disposed of along with I.A. 4613/2015 as per the order dated 2.6.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5775 of 2015
====================================================== Mubarak Hussain @ Md. Mubarak Hussain, son of Late Refakat Hussain, resident of Village- Chainpur Dhaka, P.S.- Dhaka, District-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Most. Sahida Khatoon, Wife of Late Amir Hussain. 2. Sk. Kazim, son of Late Amir Hussain 3. Sk. Nazim, son of Late Amir Hussain All residents of Village- Dhaka Ramchandra, Tola Chainpur, P.O. & P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 08-07-2015 This court vide order dated 2.6.2015 had disposed of IA No. 4613/2015 as well as the writ petition itself but inadvertently disposal of IA only has been recorded in the last paragraph of the said order. In the circumstances, let the writ petition be treated to be disposed of along with I.A.No.4613/2015 vide order dated 2.6.2015. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Shashi.
U
Mubarak Hussain @ Md. Mubarak Hussain
Most. Sahida Khatoon
Sk. Kazim
Sk. Nazim
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
