Allowed

Shailesh Kumar Singh v. The General Manager Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jun 2015CWJC/5427/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed application to add State of Bihar as respondent. Court set aside non-bailable warrant and attachment order by District Certificate Officer for failure to decide petitioner's objection first and directed petitioner to appear for cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory application to add State of Bihar as respondent allowed; non-bailable warrant and attachment order set aside; petitioner directed to appear before DCC Officer.

Shailesh Kumar Singh Vs The General Manager Food… — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5427 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== 1. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Proprietor Of M/S Bara Pacs Rice Mill Kokhsi Pacs, Son Of Late Gauri Shankar Sigh Resident Of Village Bara P.S. Kokshi Saranpur District Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The General Manager, Food Corporation Of India, Patna 2. The Assistant General Manager, Food Corporation Of India, Patna 3. The Godown In-Charge F.C.I. Madhepura 4. The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation Through Managing Director, B.S.F.C., Patna 5. The District Manager, State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the FCI : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For BSFAC : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravish Chadra, AC to SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 02-06-2015 Reg: I.A.No.4316 of 2015 .

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the parties. This interlocutory application has been filed for adding the State of Bihar as party respondent in the main writ application including the prayer for quashing the warrant of arrest and attachment order issued by the District Certificate Officer, Madhepura in Certificate Case No.10/2014-15.

¶5

Prayer is allowed. Let the State of Bihar be added as party respondent. The petitioner has already served the copy of the Interlocutory Application on the learned counsel for the State.

¶6

The petitioner has challenged both issuance of nonbailable warrant of arrest and order of attachment dated 04.05.2015.

¶7

Patna High Court CWJC No.5427 of 2014 (2) dt.02-06-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

In my view, the District Certificate Officer ought to have first decided the objection of the petitioner before issuing the nonbailable warrant of arrest and attachment order.

¶10

As such, the order dated 04.05.2015 passed by the District Certificate Officer. Madhepura in Certificate Case No.10 of 2014-15 issuing non-bailable warrant of arrest and attachment order against the petitioner is set aside. The petitioner is directed to appear before the District Certificate Officer, Madhepura positively within three weeks from today and cooperate in the certificate proceeding. The District Certificate Officer would proceed in the matter in accordance with law.

¶11

This interlocutory application and writ application thus stand allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶12

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)

¶13

ahk/U

Shailesh Kumar Singh v. The General Manager Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Kumar Singh v. The General Manager Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Bibhuti Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashish Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Mubarak Hussain @ Md. Mubarak Hussain Vs Most. Sahida Khatoon and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bigan Sahani @ Bigan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar