Budhram Bahelia v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ application dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4835 of 1998 ====================================================== Budhram Bahelia .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5078 of 1998 ====================================================== Budhram Bahelia .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Sushant Praveer, A.C. to S.C.27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 4 23-04-2015 On repeated calls being made, none appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. However, Mr. Sushant Praveer, learned A.C. to S.C.27, is present on behalf of the State. As a result, this writ application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
N.H./U
Budhram Bahelia
State of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court