Dismissed
Pathalu Rai and Anr. v. State and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/444/1993
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This was an oral order in a writ petition. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.444 of 1993
¶2
======================================================
¶3
- (a) Bholia Devi, Wife of Pathalu Rai
¶4
- (b) Pheko Kumari (Minor) (c) Ruko Kumari (Minor)
¶5
Both Daughters of Bholia Devi, R/o Vill.- Chand Chaur, P.S.-Ujiarpur, Distt.-Samastipur.
¶6
(d) Meena Devi, Wife of Satrughan Rai of Vill.-Bane Karnauti, P.S.-Jandaha, Distt.-Vaishali.
¶7
- Baleshwar Chaurasia, Son of Soman Chaurasia, resident of Vill.-Chand Chaur, P.S.-Ujiarpur, Distt.-Samastipur.
¶8
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar.
¶9
- Collector, Samastipur.
¶10
- Shambhu Rai, Son of Late Ramdeo Rai.
¶11
- Maida Devi, Widow of Late Ramdeo Rai.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Bholia Devi
- petitioner
Pheko Kumari
- petitioner
Ruko Kumari
- petitioner
Meena Devi
- petitioner
Baleshwar Chaurasia
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court