The Patna High Court dismissed a writ application on oral hearing on 27.04.2015. The petitioner had no appearance, suggesting lack of interest. The application was dismissed as against respondent no.1 for non-compliance of an earlier order.
The writ application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4302 of 1993 (10) dt.27-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4302 of 1993 ====================================================== Bishwanath Mahton .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Smt.Gayatri Devi & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 10 27-04-2015 There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On 16.5.2013 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called for final hearing. The writ application had stood dismissed as against respondent no.1 out of non compliance of the order dated 18.01.1995. These facts suggest that the petitioner has no interest left in the present matter. Learned counsel for the State is present. This application is accordingly, dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
ArunKumar/-
U
Bishwanath Mahton
Smt. Gayatri Devi & Ors.
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
