Dismissed

Sangeeta Kumari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC12 Mar 2015CWJC/3663/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna dismissed a writ petition seeking redressal of grievances regarding education posts. The court held that the petitioners had not exhausted their remedies as the administrative forum had been created and must be allowed to adjudicate the matter.

What did the court decide?

The writ application was dismissed; petitioners directed to exhaust the remedy available through the administrative forum.

Sangeeta Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3663 of 2015

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Sangeeta Kumari D/o Ranglal Ram Resident of Village Ganjbharsara, Police Station Dinara, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶5

Rina Kumari D/o Akshay lal Paswan Resident of Village Dumariya, Police Station Charpokhari, District Bhojpur at Ara.

¶6

Busara Parveen D/o Md. Amin Resident of Village Aabgila, Police Station Sahar, District Bhojpur at Ara.

¶7

Tariq Mahboob S/o Abdul Sattar Resident of Village Aabgila, Police Station Sahar, District Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in the District of Bhojpur at Ara.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara in the District of Bhojpur at Ara.

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Bhojpur at Ara.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Sahar in the District of Bhojpur at Ara.

¶13

The Block Education Officer, Sahar in the District of Bhojpur at Ara.

¶14

The Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Karbasin in the District of Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Respondent/s

¶15

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA9- Anil Kumar Sinha

¶16

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date: 12-03-2015

¶18

Occasion for entertaining the writ application at this stage

¶19

has not arisen. If a forum is created, the forum must do its job. If the

¶20

petitioners want to bypass it, the Writ Court will not entertain it. Writ is dismissed. Let the petitioners first exhaust the remedy for redressal of their grievance. The Court has not expressed its opinion on the merits of the claim. The forum will examine the grievance. If the petitioners move the tribunal, appropriate adjudication will be made within a reasonable time frame.

¶21

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶22

¶23

Sangeeta Kumari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangeeta Kumari and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shabana Ara Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Gheyasuddin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prabhat Ray and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Upashna Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nityanand Mallik Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.