Disposed
Md. Gheyasuddin v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCMJC/1881/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt application disposed of because respondents implemented court direction.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1881 of 2014
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4474 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Md. Gheyasuddin son of late Nurul Hassan, Resident of villageShekhtoli, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Vivek Kr. Singh, Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. Kundan Kumar, District Magistrate, Chapra 3. Rajeshwar Prasad, Block Development Officer, Block, Chapra .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER ***************
02. 11.03.2015 Counsel for the petitioner does not press the Contempt Application, because the respondents have carried out the direction issued by the Court. Show-cause has been filed on behalf of the State. Contempt Application stands disposed off, accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/-
U
Md. Gheyasuddin
The State of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court