A single-judge court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order in consolidation proceedings due to complicated factual questions, granting parties liberty to approach the civil court for redressal.
Writ petition disposed; liberty granted to approach civil court for redressal subject to civil court result.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3512 of 1995
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER
8 01-04-2015 Two petitioners have challenged order dated 29.10.1994, passed by respondent no.2 as contained in Annexure 7. Initially petitioner no.1 died and his wife was substituted vide order dated 13.1.1998. The matter arises out of the consolidation proceeding and it concerns complicated question of facts.
In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the parties to approach the Civil court for redressal of the grievance. Needless to state that order of the revisional authority would be subject to the result of the case filed before the Civil court.
Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the consolidation order should be decided or disposed of in favor of civil court jurisdiction.
What relief is appropriate when a matter involves complicated questions of fact arising from land consolidation proceedings.
Kalawati Devi
Amrendra Kumar
State of Bihar
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
