Disposal of a writ petition regarding a High Tension wire crossing a petrol pump. The court was satisfied by the counter affidavit stating the wire would pass through government land and not the petrol pump, thus dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21368 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinay Raj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
3 16-01-2015 Mr. Abhinay Raj for the petitioners and Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha for the respondent company as well as distribution company are present.
Although the matter has been listed under the heading ‘For orders (on petitions) to consider the interim prayer made by the petitioner but taking note of the fact that the pleadings are complete hence with the consent of the parties the writ petition itself has been taken up with a view to its final disposal.
A counter affidavit has been filed after service on
Patna High Court CWJC No.21368 of 2014 (3) dt.19-01-2015
2
counsel for the petitioners which is taken on record.
The writ petition has been filed inter alia for a direction to the respondents not to put a high tension wire crossing the petrol pump of the petitioners. The counter affidavit in paragraph5, 6 and 7 filed by the legal supervisor of the respondent company inter alia states that the proposed 11 K.V. wire would not be passing over the petrol pump and that it would pass mostly through the government land and would be carried out in accordance with law.
In view of the categorical statement made in the counter affidavit, the apprehension expressed by the petitioners does not survive and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
S.Sb/-
U
M/s Maha Laxmi Service Station
Smt. Minu Savarkar
Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.
Chairman, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.
Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.
General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Central Area Board
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
