Dismissed

Kashi Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Dec 2015CWJC/21230/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 regarding land claims, holding that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 17A of the Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954. Factual issues must be decided by statutory authorities before invoking judicial review.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to approach the prescribed authority under Section 17A of the Act for redressal of valid grievances regarding lands claimed.

Kashi Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21230 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Kashi Singh Son of Late Muneshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village - Koyladewa, Tola - Semarbari, P.S. Phulwaria, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Collector, Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj 2. Bihar Bhoodan Yagna, Committee, Road No. 34 Gardanibagh, Patna, P.S. Gardanibagh, District - Patna through its Chairman 3. Chairman, Bihar Bhoodan Yagna, Committee, Road No. 34 Gardanibagh, Patna, P.S. Gardanibagh, District - Patna 4. Officer - Secretary, District - Bhoodan Yagna Committee, Arar More, Gopalganj, P.S. And District - Gopalganj 5. Ram Sevak Singh Son of Late Sukhari Singh Resident Of Village - Koyaldewa, Tola - Semarbari, P.S. Phulwaria, District - Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5 For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Mr. Sunil Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 17-12-2015 Heard the parties. With respect to the issues raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present proceeding filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which have been enumerated in paragraph-1 of the writ petition, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy before the statutory authority/ forum prescribed under Section 17A of The Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954 (In short ‘Act, 1954’). Furthermore, the claims raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present proceeding have been controverted by the respondent no. 5 by filing a counter-affidavit.

¶4

It is well settled that the issues of facts must be raised and conclusively decided by the statutory authorities and only thereafter powers of judicial review of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may be invoked.

¶5

Patna High Court CWJC No.21230 of 2013 (2) dt.17-12-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

In above view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed, but a liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the prescribed authority provided under Section 17A of the Act, 1954 for redressal of his valid grievances with respect to the lands claimed by him.

¶8

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶9

BTiwary/U

Kashi Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kashi Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rabin Mandal@Rabin @Rabindra Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhulan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Godavari Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Masihujma Khan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.