====================================================== Vijay Paswan, S/O Sri Brahmdeo Paswan @ Brahmdeo Ram, Resident Of Village- Pande Dih Kewal, P.S.- Sirdala, Anchal- Sirdala, Sub-DivisionNawada, Dist.- Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Commissioner Magadh Division, Gaya 3. The District Collector, Nawada 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Nawada 5. Circle Officer, Circle Office, Sirdala, Nawada 6. Circle Inspector, Circle Office, Sirdala, Nawada 7. Halka Karmchari, Mauza-Ghatbaksheela Under Sirdala Circle .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dev Kumar Pandey, AC to GP-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 16-12-2015 After having heard the parties and in view of the nature of the claims/grievances raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ petition, this Court is of the opinion that, instead of keeping the matter pending before this Court awaiting the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents, interest of justice shall be sub-served, if the petitioner is granted liberty to file a comprehensive representation with all supporting documents in support of his claims before the respondent District Collector, Nawada. It is ordered accordingly. If such a comprehensive representation is filed on behalf of the petitioner within a period of one month from today with a certified copy of the present order, then the respondent District Collector, Nawada either himself or any other competent authority, so authorized by him, shall be obliged to consider and decide the claims of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking
