Disposed

Ganesh Prasad Gupta v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC5 Jan 2015CWJC/18473/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition regarding PF dues. The court directed the petitioner to seek error correction from respondent no 10 for G.P.F. calculation, with liberty to approach the court thereafter if an error is found.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation for duty-b; consideration within four weeks; payment and reasoned order within three weeks if due found.

Ganesh Prasad Gupta Vs the State of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18473 of 2008

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ganesh Prasad Gupta, Son of Late Bageshwari Prasad Gupta, C/o Sri Dhananjay Mahto, Near Shyam Babu Das, resident of Mohalla-Dariyapur Gola, Mohar Tola, P.O.-Bankipur, P.S.-Pirbahore, District and Town-Patna800004.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

The Commissioner cum Secretary, Government of Bihar, Department of Finance, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Commissioner cum Secretary, Government of Bihar, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Civil Surgeon cum S.E.M.O., Patna.

¶9

The Deputy Superintendent, Rajendra Nagar Hospital, Patna.

¶10

The Accountant General (A & E) Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, P.O.G.P.O.-Patna.

¶11

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶12

The Director of Provident Fund, Panth Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶13

The District Accounts Officer, Patna Collectrate, Patna. 10. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna Collectrate, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. For the Respondents : Mr. ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

5. 05.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

The dues of the petitioner have been paid but there are some errors in calculation.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed off with the liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 10 pointing out any error in computing of the G.P.F. If such representation is filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today along with a copy of this order, the same shall be considered by

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.18473 of 2008 (5) dt.05-01-2015

¶19

2/2

¶20

respondent no. 10 and disposed off in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of its filing by passing a reasoned order. If any amount is found due and payable to the petitioner, the same shall be paid within the next three weeks.

¶21

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶22

Anand Kr.
U

Ganesh Prasad Gupta v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Prasad Gupta v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malti Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Jaggu Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr.Nehal Ahmad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Madhu Kant Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Vinay Kumar Thakur and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.