Disposed

Smriti Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Dec 2015CWJC/15131/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition petitioners Scheduled Caste status claim by directing them to approach the State-level Scrutiny Committee constituted under the Kumari Madhuri Patil judgment, without expressing a view on the claim's merit.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to approach the State-level Scrutiny Committee constituted under the direction in Kumari Madhuri Patil (1994) 6 SCC 241.

Smriti Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15131 of 2015

¶3

====================================================== Smriti Kumar Jha son of Late Rajendra Jha Resident of village and P.O. Bakharpur, P.S. Pirpaiti, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur. 5. The District Welfare Officer, Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur. 7. The Circle Officer, Pirpaiti, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar -Manglam For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc27- Kinkar Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 6 11-12-2015 Heard Mr. S.B.K. Manglam appearing for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed. The petitioner claims status of Scheduled Caste being a member of Chamar community/caste. Earlier, he had approached this Court vide CWJC No. 13624 of 2015. The said writ application was disposed of directing the SubDivisional Officer, Kahalgaon to consider the caste status of the petitioner and take a final decision. In consequence

¶4

Patna High Court CWJC No.15131 of 2015 (6) dt.11-12-2015

¶5

2/3

¶6

whereof, impugned order (Annexure-9) has been passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kahalgaon rejecting the prayer/request of the petitioner to grant the status of Scheduled Caste.

¶7

There is no controversy at Bar that in the light of the order passed in the case of Kumari Madhuri Patil vs. Addl. Commissioner [(1994) 6 SCC 241], a resolution of the government in the department of erstwhile Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Annexure-A to the supplementary counter affidavit) has been issued constituting a scrutiny committee at the State level which shall now go into such claim/dispute.

¶8

Having regard to the above and without expressing any view on the merit of the claim, the writ application is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to approach the Scrutiny Committee constituted at the State level by the respondent-State Government for visualization of his grievance. If any such application/representation is filed, the matter shall be placed before and considered by the Scrutiny Committee in accordance with law as quickly as possible.

¶9

Before parting with this records, this Court would

¶10

Patna High Court CWJC No.15131 of 2015 (6) dt.11-12-2015

¶11

3/3

¶12

note that in doing so the Scrutiny Committee shall not, in any manner, be prejudiced/influenced by the order which the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kahalgaon passed and contained in Annexure-9 and the decision of the Scrutiny Committee shall hold the field.

¶13

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶14

HR/-

¶15

Smriti Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smriti Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Amrendra Kumar Ojha Vs the Life Insurance Corpn. of I

Mangani Rai Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Umarendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sarvashree Pundra Herbs Vs the Principal Secretary Cum Ch

Anil Kumar Bagaria Vs Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Biscomaun, through the Managing Director and Ors.