An oral order where the petitioner in a service case sought to withdraw the writ petition to approach the appropriate authority. The High Court dismissed the writ petition granting liberty to withdraw.
Liberty to withdraw the writ application with liberty to seek redressal from the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15074 of 2007
====================================================== Rajesh Prasad son of Banarshi Singh resident of village- Barki Singhi, P.O. & P.S. Ara, Bhojpur at present working as a candidate peon in the office of the Sub Divisional Officer, Ara, Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector, Bhojpur, Ara 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhojpur, Ara .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D. K. Sinha For the State Mr. S. K. Saraf, A.C. to G.P.18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 5 27-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. K. Saraf, A.C. to G.P. 18 for the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 in which it has been stated that the name of the petitioner finds mentioned in the district panel which was prepared on 08.12.2008 and revised on 28.06.2010.
The writ application does not set out all relevant facts and as such it is difficult for this Court to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
Counsel for the petitioner after making submission at some length seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance in the light of the statements made in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15074 of 2007 (5) dt.27-04-2015
2 / 2
counter affidavit.
The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
HR/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the lack of relevant facts stated in the application.
Rajesh Prasad
The State of Bihar
The Collector, Bhojpur, Ara
The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhojpur, Ara
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
