The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by seven petitioners (family members) against the State of Bihar and officials in consolidation proceedings due to non-prosperation, as no one appeared on repeated calls.
Writ application dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure of parties to appear on repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8385 of 1997
===========================================================
.... .... Respondents
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : None For the Respondent : None
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-04-2015
Despite repeated calls nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Same is the case with the respondents as well as the State.
The writ application arises out of a consolidation proceeding. The petitioners lost in all the three Courts below.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8385 of 1997 dt.23-04-2015
2/2
Be that as it may, since no one has appeared on repeated calls to press this application, this Court is constrained to dismiss this writ application for non- prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/U
Rameshwar Ram
Gyatri Devi
Parmila Devi
Uma Devi
Nirmala Devi
Gangiya Devi
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
