Disposed

Chandra Nand Jha v. the Union of India and Ors.

Patna HC13 Jan 2015CWJC/11783/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ for unpaid Risk Fund. Court directed respondents to send the requisite form within four weeks, petitioner to return it within three weeks, and payment to be made within two months thereafter if details are complete.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to send Risk Fund form within four weeks; to receive return within three weeks, and to pay if complete within two months.

Chandra Nand Jha Vs the Union of India and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11783 of 2011

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandra Nand Jha, Ex.Lance Naik 820700095, S/o Late Ramjee Jha, R/o Vill-Matihani, Post Office Matihani, Police Station Matihani, DistrictBegusarai.(Bihar)

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi.

¶6

The Deputy Commandent (Welfare) Directorate of Central Reserve Police Force Block No. 1, Central Office Centre, Lodi Road New Delhi-3. 3. The Director General, Eastern Sector, Central Reserve Polices Force Saltlak, Kolkata-106.

¶7

The Deputy Director General Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Bhubneshwar, Orissa.-11.

¶8

The Director of Account PAO (GPF Cell CRPF) C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-3.

¶9

The Additional D.I.G.P. Group Centre, C.R.P.F, .Bhubaneshwar, Orissa11.

¶10

The Commandant 66, B.N., C.R.P.F. Tuensang, Nagaland.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Adv. For the Union of India : Mr. Anshuman Singh, Adv. (C.G.C.)

¶14

==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

5. 13.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

From the pleadings it appears that only the amount of Risk Fund payable to the petitioner remains unpaid for which as per the stand of learned counsel for the respondents, the onus lies on the petitioner as he has not filled up the requisite form. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that all forms required to be filled up have already been so done by the petitioner. However, without getting into this unnecessary controversy, learned counsel for

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.11783 of 2011 (5) dt.13-01-2015

¶19

2/2

¶20

the petitioner agrees that he shall once again re-submit the requisite form which may be made available to him by the concerned authority.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off directing the authorities to send a form with regard to Risk Fund to the petitioner at the petitioner’s address as mentioned in the writ application within four weeks from today. The petitioner shall thereafter return the filled up form within the next three weeks to the same authority which had sent the form to him. The authority shall thereafter make all admitted payment of the Risk Fund to the petitioner within two months thereafter.

¶22

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶23

P. Kumar

¶24

Chandra Nand Jha v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Nand Jha v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Keshari Kishore Sharan,Advocat Vs v.C.,Magadh University and Ors.

Shiv Kumari Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Chandra Prasad Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Shanti Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Paras Nath Singh Vs The Chairman and Managing Director