Allowed

Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashish Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Ministry Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Patna HC5 Aug 2015CR. WJC/708/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a life convict seeking a direction to release him from custody as he had completed his sentence. The court directed the State Government to consider the petitioner's case for sentence remission at the next meeting of the Remission Board.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State Government to consider the petitioner's case for sentence remission at the next meeting of the Remission Board.

Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashish Sharma Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.708 of 2015

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashish Sharma, son of Late Triveni Singh, Resident of Village-Moldiar Tola, Kokama, P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Secretary Ministry of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

Inspector General (Prison), Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The State Sentence Remission Board through its Chairman, Department of Home, Patna.

¶10

The Jail Superintendent, Adarsh Central Jail, Beur, Patna.

¶11

.... .... Respondents

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar, AC to A.G.

¶14

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA

¶15

and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶17

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)

¶18

2 05-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶19

The petitioner has come up to this Court seeking a direction on the respondent authorities to release the petitioner from custody as he has already completed the sentence for life imprisonment and for consequential direction.

¶20

In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State the stand taken is that that the State Government has not considered the case of the petitioner although in terms of the period of imprisonment undergone by him he would be eligible for such consideration due to the order dated 9.7.2014 passed by the Supreme Court in Writ Petition(Criminal) No. 48 of 2014.

¶21

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.708 of 2015 (2) dt.05-08-2015

¶22

¶23

In the reply to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner it is stated that the order dated 9.7.2014 has been modified by the Apex Court by order dated 27.7.2015 confining the non-consideration of remission matter with respect to certain specific classes of cases, which do not include the case of the petitioner.

¶24

The stand of the State Government even in the counter affidavit is very clear that as soon as the Supreme Court shall vacate the restriction on remission, the matter of remission shall be considered by the State Remission Board and accordingly action will be taken by the State Government.

¶25

In view of the above facts and the stand of the State Government, the writ application is disposed of with the direction to the State Government to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law taking into consideration the order of modification passed by the Apex Court. Let the case of the petitioner, if otherwise eligible, be considered at the next meeting of the Remission Board.

¶26

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)

¶27

spal/-

¶28

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶29

Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashish Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Ministry Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashish Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Ministry Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwak Sen Pandey and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gangesh Kuamr Jha @ Ganesh Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jairam Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Braj Kishore Ray Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Satyendra Kumar and Co. Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naresh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.