Patna High Court dismissed a criminal writ jurisdiction petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner had previously withdrawn an identical plea with liberty to approach Calcutta High Court.
Writ application dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.666 of 2015 (4) dt.05-08-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.666 of 2015
====================================================== Naresh Prasad, son of Kishundeo Choudhary, resident of Gai Ghat, Uttrai Gali, Opposite Kali Mandir, P.O. Gulzarbagh, P.S. Alamganj, District - Patna
.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 5. The S.D.P.O., Patna City, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ashok Kr. Choudhary, AAG 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 4 05-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is evident that the petitioner had filed Cr.W.J.C. No. 517 of 2011 for the same relief, which was permitted to be withdrawn by order dated 23.1.2012 with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Calcutta High Court, which appeared to have jurisdiction in relation to the relief sought in the writ application. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present writ application is not maintainable. It is dismissed as not maintainable.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Sudhir Singh, J) spal/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ application is maintainable in view of a prior withdrawal of a similar application with liberty to approach Calcutta High Court.
Naresh Prasad
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
