The High Court of Judicature at Patna, in a Criminal Writ Jurisdiction case, allowed the withdrawal of an application and dismissed it as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Permission to withdraw the application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.526 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Smt. Sunita Shahi @ Sunita Shahi W/o Sri Ajit Sharma Resident of Village Arpa, P.S. Hilsa, District Nalanda .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Commissioner (MREGA), Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Nalanda 4. The Programme Officer, Hilsa, District Nalanda .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Radha Krishna Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Dr.Anshuman (Sc 14)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER
6 30-04-2015 After some arguments the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed. This application is dismissed as withdrawn in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 193 of 2014.
(Gopal Prasad, J)
SA/-
U √ T √
Smt. Sunita Shahi @ Sunita Shahi
The State of Bihar
The Commissioner (MREGA), Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Nalanda
The Programme Officer, Hilsa, District Nalanda
Gopal Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
