Dismissed

Sanjay Saw v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Apr 2015CR. MISC./21289/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for regular bail regarding allegations of murder and conspiracy, the Patna High Court refused bail despite arguments. However, the trial was directed to be expedited, with notice for renewal if the trial exceeds the deadline.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial and allow renewal petition if trial takes longer than five months.

Sanjay Saw Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21289 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 21289 of 2014

¶3

Arising out of P. S. Case No. - 70 Year - 2007 Thana - KASIMBAZAR District - MUNGER ====================================================== 1. Sanjay Saw, Son of Late Narayan Sao, R/o PC Batta Colony Between Baser P.S. - Kasim Bazar, Distt - Munger .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : For the Opposite Party : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a case under Sections 147, 149, 307, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3/5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

¶4

The prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 22.11.2013 in view of the fact that there is direct allegation of firing against the petitioner by which son of the informant succumbed to the injury.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contended that the informant has been examined in the case and has not supported the prosecution case.

¶6

However, a report has been received from the Additional Sessions Judge, Munger before whom the trial is pending stating that the prosecution has already examined 11 witnesses out of the 20 named in the charge sheet and now only 9 witnesses are yet to be examined and

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21289 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015

¶8

the case may be disposed of within six months.

¶9

Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with S.T. No. 296 of 2013 arising out of Kasimbazar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2007 pending in the Court of Ad hoc 8^th , Munger. The prayer of bail is rejected.

¶10

rejected.

¶11

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and if the same is not concluded within five months then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after five months.

¶12

(Gopal Prasad, J.)

¶13

Kundan/-

¶14

U T

Sanjay Saw v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Saw v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Tabrej Alam @ Temraj Alam @ Tabraj Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shibalak Jamadar Vs State of Bihar

Shrawan Jamadar Vs State of Bihar

Jainarayan Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Suresh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Salt Traders Proprietor Ma Vs the Union of India through Th