In this criminal revision, the Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the judgment of acquittal, finding no reason to interfere with the lower court's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.993 of 2002
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 1995 Thana -null District- GAYA =========================================================== Sri R. P. Singh, the then Branch Manager, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Branch Officer Swarajpuri road, Gandhi Maidan (East), Gaya, through Sri Subash Sharma, IAS, Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, ‘B.S.F.C.’ Building, Fraser road, Patna 800001, who holds power to execute Vakalatnama on behalf of the corporation and its officials being the Managing Director of the Corporation .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Prabhu Nath Singh S/o late Ram Chandra Singh, Managing Director, M/s Raja Mechanised Bricks Pvt. Ltd. 3. Raghu Nath Saran Singh, S/o late Ram Chandra Singh, Director, M/s Raja Mechanised Bricks Pvt. Ltd. 4. Ajit Kumar Singh S/o Sri Prabhu Nath Singh, Director, M/s Raja Mechanised Bricks Pvt. Ltd., opp. Parties No.2 to 4 residents of Durga Shankar road, Sirighat, P.S. Kotwali, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-11-2015 The Petitioner seeks revision of the judgment of acquittal dated 20.7.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Gaya in G.R. case No.1313 of 1995 (Trial No.24 of 2002) arising out of Magadh University P.S. case No.24 of 1995.
Having gone through the impugned judgment, I do not find any reason for interference.
Hence, the revision application is dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court.
Bihar State Financial Corporation
The State of Bihar
Prabhu Nath Singh
Raghu Nath Saran Singh
Ajit Kumar Singh
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
