Petitioner sought revision against conviction judgment. Court found no ground for interference but modified sentence to period already undergone. Revision dismissed.
Sentence modified to period already undergone by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.1092 of 2002
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -339 Year- 1986 Thana -null District- SAMASTIPUR
=========================================================== Ganeshi Singh son of Muneshwar Singh, resident of village Karai Mushara, Police Station Bibhutipur, District Samastipur
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nirmal Kr. Sinha-3, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-11-2015
The Petitioner seeks revision of the judgment of conviction dated 1.2.2002 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur in Criminal Appeal No.135 of 1991, by which he has upheld the conviction of the Petitioner passed on 16.9.1991 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Rosera at Samastipur in Trial No.837 of 1991 (G.R. No.339 of 1986).
Having gone through the impugned judgment, I do not find any reason for interference. However, considering the date of occurrence, the sentence is modified to the period already undergone by him.
With the aforesaid modification in sentence, the revision application stands dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence imposed in the conviction judgment requires modification due to delay or other reasons?
Whether any ground exists to interfere with the impugned judgment of conviction?
Ganeshi Singh
State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
