Allowed

Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Feb 2015CR. MISC./6854/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Sunil Singh, in a case registered for IPC offenses and conspiracy to commit mischief. The Court observed that the accusation was against a mob and that the delay in receiving the FIR suggested antedating, indicating the case was lodged to save the police involved in the incident.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the CJM at Chapra.

Sunil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6854 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2014 Thana -PANAPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Sunil Singh Son of Ram Awatar Singh, Resident of Village - Salempur, P.S. - Panapur, District - Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 23-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.01.2015 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 337, 332, 379, 435, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.

¶3

It is alleged that seven FIR named accused persons including the petitioner and several unknown were assaulting a person who alleged to have established forceful physical relationship with seven years old girl and thereafter killed her when police came, the mob got agitation and burnt the police

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6854 of 2015 (02) dt.23-02-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

jeep and took away the stepney of the jeep.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accusation is against the mob who agitated due to non-action of the police against the accused hence to save their skin the police has lodged the present case. The FIR was registered on 25.10.2014 but reached to the court on 28.10.2014 which suggests that antedating was done.

¶8

Considering the accusation against the mob, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2014.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

DKS/-

¶11

U T

Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sit Lal Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Jha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Rai and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Radhe Shyam Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Ashok Patel Vs The State Of Bihar