Dismissed

Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Feb 2015CR. MISC./5819/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for anticipatory bail under Section 307 IPC, the Patna High Court rejected the plea due to specific allegations of assault with a Gadasa causing injury, directing the petitioner to surrender for regular bail proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail.

Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5819 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -591 Year- 2014 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Yadav, Son of Mallu Yadav, Resident of Village - Thodi, P.S. Sonham, District - Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 11-02-2015 Heard both sides.

¶4

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

The informant alleged that on the order of Mohan Pandey, Shankar Pandey, the petitioner, assaulted the informant with Gadasa on his head and thereafter other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant and also took out money from his pocket.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated. During the course of investigation, it has come that the informant himself is a bad man, who is used to abuse the villagers. On account of the assault made by the petitioner, simple injury is found on the head

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5819 of 2015 (2) dt.11-02-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

of the informant.

¶10

On perusal of the record, it appears that the informant made a very specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant with Gadasa on his head and corresponding injury is found. Hence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 591/2014. Accordingly, the prayer is rejected.

¶11

The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below and make prayer for regular bail. The court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

¶12

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶13

Dilip/-

¶14

U T

Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bihari Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Ranjan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Naresh Bishwas Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rukmani Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Uttam Paswan @ Uttam Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rukmani Devi Vs The State Of Bihar