Allowed

Nazmul @ Nazbul @ Dilawar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4944/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench oral order allowing the petitioner's bail in an IPC theft and robbery case. Directed release on bond with sureties but imposed a condition to forfeit bonds upon three consecutive bail defaults due to criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to cancellation if defaulting three consecutive times.

Nazmul @ Nazbul @ Dilawar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4944 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -326 Year- 2014 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== 1. Nazmul @ Nazbul @ Dilawar Son of Ali Mohammad Resident of villJahangir Tola,P.S+Distt-Araria .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party : Mr. Madhuranand Jha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2015 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.08.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that accused persons robbed the cash, mobiles of the informant and the passengers of Tata Magic vehicle. During investigation the petitioner was apprehended when he confessed his guilt.

¶3

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that neither recovery has been made from the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on T.I.P. The statements to that effect have been made in para 7 and 8 of the petition and after petitioner being roped in the present case, he has been made accused in three other cases.

¶4

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4944 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria(Bairgachhi) P.S. Caes No. 326 of 2014.

¶8

Since the petitioner has criminal antecedent, let learned Court below cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

Shageer/-

¶11

U T

Nazmul @ Nazbul @ Dilawar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazmul @ Nazbul @ Dilawar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Sah @ Pankaj Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Paltan Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Naresh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramdeo Kewat and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Akram @ Ekram Vs The State Of Bihar