Allowed

Krishna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4914/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge granted bail to the petitioners in a case under Sections 304(B), 201, and 34 IPC. The court held that despite the allegation of conspiracy, there was no valid claim of torture against the petitioners, justifying the release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each within four weeks.

Krishna Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4914 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2014 Thana -BANIAPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== 1. Krishna Singh, Son of Sri Deep Narayan Singh 2. Smt. Pramila Devi, W/O Murari Ray, Both are residents of Village - Hafijpur, P.S.- Baniyapur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA

¶3

ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 04-02-2015 Heard both sides.

¶5

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 220/2014 registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Birendra Thakur, the father of the deceased, made allegation that his daughter was done away with by the accused persons.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are uncle and aunt of the husband of the deceased. They are separate in mess and they have no manner of concern with the family affairs of Satish Rai, the husband of the deceased.

¶8

On perusal of the records, it appears that the informant himself stated that Satish Rai (husband of the deceased),

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4914 of 2015 (2) dt.04-02-2015

¶10

2/2

¶11

and Parmila Devi (wife of Murari Rai) conspired with other accused persons in commission of crime. There is no allegation of demand of torture against the petitioners.

¶12

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Saran at Chapra in Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 220/2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶13

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶14

Dilip/-

¶15

U T

Krishna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Kishun Deo Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nandan Mukhiya @ Nandan Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhuchandra Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Kumar Srivastava Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Irfan Vs The State Of Bihar