Allowed

Kishun Deo Ram v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC3 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4572/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in complaints filed under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, directing him to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directs petitioner to surrender within four weeks and furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to be enlarged on bail.

Kishun Deo Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4572 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -911 Year- 2013 Thana -MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMADHUBANI ====================================================== 1. Kishun Deo Ram Son of Sri Chalittar Ram Resident of Village - Kanoil, Police Station - Rahika, District - Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Runa Devi Wife of Sri Kishun Deo Ram Daughter of Sri Bakur Ram Resident of Village - Kanoil, Police Station - Rahika, District - Madhubani at present residing at Resident of Village - Jitwarpur, Police Station - Rahika, District - Madhubani. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 911 of 2013, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶3

The complainant, wife of the petitioner alleged that she was married to the petitioner in the year 2003 and also gave birth to a child, but thereafter, her husband neglected her. It appears that the complainant went to the house of her husband on 08.07.2013, but her husband did not allow to live there and assaulted her.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4572 of 2015 (2) dt.03-02-2015

¶5

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still ready to keep his wife.

¶7

On perusal of the records, it appears that the wife was noticed by the learned Sessions Judge, but she did not appear in the court and after ten years of marriage the complainant filed this case making allegation of demand of dowry and torture.

¶8

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 911 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶9

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶10

KKSINHA/-

¶11

U T

Kishun Deo Ram v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishun Deo Ram v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jhabu Lal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraja @ Suraj Master Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manik Chand Choudhary and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Nandan Mukhiya @ Nandan Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar