Dismissed

Ravi Ranjan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jan 2015CR. MISC./46407/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected a bail petition filed by an accused in a criminal case. The court declined to grant bail at this stage, especially as a prior bail petition had been rejected. However, it directed the lower court to conclude the trial within one year, allowing for a renewed bail prayer if the delay occurs.

What did the court decide?

The bail petition was rejected. Direction to the court below to conclude the trial within one year.

Ravi Ranjan Prakash Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46407 of 2014 (3) dt.07-01-2015

¶2

	IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46407 of 2014
	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -871 Year- 2012 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
	Ravi Ranjan Prakash Son of Ram Chandra Rai @ Ram Chandra Ram, resident of village - Piyunibagh, Police Station- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
3	07-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 43841 of 2013 and this Court, vide order dated 21^stOctober 2013, rejected the same.
	At this stage, this Court does not feel inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is rejected. However, the court below is directed to conclude the trial within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded by the aforesaid period, the petitioner will have liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

¶3

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶4

Mahesh/-

¶5

U T

Ravi Ranjan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Ranjan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Ram and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gopal Jha Vs The Bihar State Road Transport Cor. and Ors.

Anirudh Kumar Prasad Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Mahabir Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Ramshankar Choudhary Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Mandal Vs The Union Of India and Ors.