Allowed

Nakchhedi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Sept 2015CR. MISC./45129/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order deals with a bail petition filed by an appellant who was previously declared an absconder and had his bail cancelled. The High Court, considering the facts, granted bail on furnishing a bond with sureties, subject to conditions of appearing in court for a specific period, allowing the petitioner to be released while the case remains pending.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail with sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to appearing in court for 9 months or till trial conclusion.

Nakchhedi Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45129 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 1997 Thana -MAHISI District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Nakchhedi Rai Son of Late Manu Rai, Resident of Village- Birgown, P.S.Jalay, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 29-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶3

It is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that the bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 18.11.2006 and subsequently, his case was separated from the case of other accused. On 26.11.2012 he was declared absconder. The petitioner was apprehended by the police on 20.6.2015 on the strength of process issued against him.

¶4

The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that earlier the petitioner was on bail and his case was committed to the Court of Sessions in the year 1999. The charge against the petitioner was framed in the year 2001 and till the year 2006 only

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45129 of 2015 (2) dt.29-09-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

one prosecution witness could be examined and after that the petitioner went outside the State in connection with his livelihood resulting in cancellation of his bail bond.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mahishi (Jalay) P.S. Case No. 79 of 1997 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 14/1999 (Reg. No. 222/2015) to the satisfaction of Sri N.K.P.Singh, A.D.J.-II, Saharsa, subject to the condition that he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date in person for a period of 9 months or till conclusion of the trial whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶9

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶10

S.Pandey/U T

Nakchhedi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nakchhedi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Dom @ Kamlesh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Salauddin @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Dahin Singh @ Ramdain Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinanath Sah @ Vicky Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Narayan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailash Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar