Allowed

Nawajis Ali @ Md. Nawajish v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 May 2015CR. MISC./45109/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judicial order granted anticipatory bail to a husband in a complaint case alleging torture under Section 498A IPC. The court imposed conditions regarding financial support for a child, access to the child, payment compliance, and a reconciliation offer made to the wife which she rejected. Bail bondRs10000 was required with two sureties. Release contingent on surrender/arrest within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender/arrest within 12 weeks, furnishing Rs. 10000 bail bond with two sureties, and compliance with payment and visitation conditions.

Nawajis Ali @ Md. Nawajish Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45109 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -855 Year- 2014 Thana -KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKATIHAR ====================================================== 1. Nawajis Ali @ Md. Nawajish Son of Abdul Latif Resident of village - Dagoal, P.S. Balrampur, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bibi Aman Khatoon W/o Nawajis Ali, D/o Md. Yasin resident of village - Harnathpur, P.S. Balia Belone, Kadwa, District - Katihar .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh No.1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 19-05-2015 Petitioner being husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The basic accusation is torture.

¶3

The notices were issued to the complainant on the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with dignity and honour. A statement to that effect has been made in para 8 of the petition which reads as follows:-

¶4

“That the petitioner is ready to keep his

¶5

wife with all respect and dignity………………..”

¶6

The petitioner and the complainant are

¶7

present. The petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45109 of 2014 (4) dt.19-05-2015

¶9

2/3

¶10

with dignity and honour but the offer is not acceptable to the complainant as she is apprehensive due to the past conduct of the petitioner. Hence, the reconciliation does not appear to be

¶11

feasible.

¶12

The factum of marriage between the petitioner and the complainant and birth of a male child are admitted facts.

¶13

In the alternative, the petitioner is ready to make payment of Rs. 1500/- to the complainant for the welfare of the child from July, 2015, by depositing the same in the bank account of the complainant by second week of every consecutive month. The aforesaid offer is acceptable to the complainant who undertakes to supply her bank account number within a period of three weeks by filing the same on affidavit before learned Court below.

¶14

The complainant is ready to allow the petitioner to meet the child once in every month.

¶15

Considering the present stand of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 855 of 2014.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45109 of 2014 (4) dt.19-05-2015

¶17

3/3

¶18

The aforesaid payments will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance, or related proceeding.

¶19

Three consecutive defaults in making payment will give liberty to the complainant to file appropriate application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner but this liberty will be subject to the complainant allowing the petitioner to meet the children once in a month.

¶20

The present order in no way will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶21

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Shageer/-

¶23

U T

Nawajis Ali @ Md. Nawajish v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nawajis Ali @ Md. Nawajish v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Mangal Bind and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Mohan Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Kumar @ Babloo Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijay Kumar Verma Vs The State Of Bihar