Allowed

Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 May 2015CR. MISC./15475/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a murder and armed offense case, noting that co-accused had already been released. The court imposed strict conditions, directing cancellation of bail for two consecutive defaults due to arbitrations in another case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, excepting cancellation of bond for two consecutive defaults.

Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15475 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2007 Thana -SIKANDARA District- JAMUI

¶4

====================================================== Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi Son of Jago Manjhi Resident of village - Gahlaur, Police Station - Sikandra, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ……. .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. M.K.Gautam(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 18-05-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.08.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the accused persons including the petitioner surrounded Brahmdeo Thakur and threatened not to depose in the earlier case lodged by him whereupon co-accused Devendra Yadav, Prakash Yadav and Masudan Mahto made indiscriminate firing. Subsequently, Shankar Yadav also resorted to fire killing the father of the informant on the spot. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15475 of 2015 (02) dt.18-05-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

petitioner that the accusation of firing is not against the petitioner and accused persons against whom overt act has been alleged i.e. Masudan Mahto and Prakash Yadav have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 18440 of 2009.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that in a case of 2007 petitioner was apprehended in 2015.

¶9

Considering the fact that assailants have been granted bail, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, IInd, Jamui in connection with Sessions Trial No. 392 of 2010 arising out of Sikandra P.S. Case No. 149 of 2007, but keeping in view of the fact that the petitioner is accused in Sikandra P.S. Case No. 168 of 2005 also and has been arrested in the present case after seven years of the institution of the case, the learned court below will positively cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he defaults for two consecutive occasions.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

DKS/-

¶12

U T

Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gena Manjhi @ Gauna Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghunath Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sita Ram Vishwakarma Vs The State Of Bihar

Ratish Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramji Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhim Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Pathak @ Rahul Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar