Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 Oct 2015CR. MISC./41906/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC granted provisional anticipatory bail to a petitioner accused of ICPS offences for failing to supply custom milled rice against an agreement. Bail contingent on future deposit of 20% of dues within four months.

What did the court decide?

Release on provisional anticipatory bail for five months, subject to depositing 20% of alleged dues within four months and surrendering before the Court below within 12 weeks.

Santosh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Corruption | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41906 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2015 Thana -NAWANGAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== 1. Santosh Kumar, son of Sri Awadh Narayan Prasad, Resident of VillageParmanpur (New Anpurna Rice Mill), P.S.- Nawanagar, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. District Manager Bihar State Civil Supply Food Corrporation, Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Chandra Shekhar Azad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-10-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶3

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The prosecution case is that the petitioner being rice miller was supplied 3666.58 quintals of paddy by the Buxar unit of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited under agreement during the procurement years 2011-12, in lieu thereof the petitioner was supposed to supply 2456.61 (67% of paddy supplied) quintals of Custom Milled Rice(CMR) worth Rs. 46,75,246/- but the petitioner failed to supply the same.

¶5

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that custom milled rice could not be supplied due to

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41906 of 2015 (2) dt.12-10-2015

¶7

2/3

¶8

the latches on the part of the authorities of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited. The agreement stipulates recovery of due amount through initiation of certification proceeding under Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 and consequently Certificate Case No. 11 of 2014-15 has already been initiated.

¶9

However, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that petitioner is ready to deposit 20% of the alleged due amount within a period of four months in four equal monthly installments through bank draft in favour of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Patna. Though statement to that effect has not been made in the petition.

¶10

Mr. Lokesh, learned counsel for the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation accepts the offer of the petitioner.

¶11

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for five months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41906 of 2015 (2) dt.12-10-2015

¶13

3/3

¶14

Cr.P.C.

¶15

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned Court below on deposit of 20% of the alleged due amount in four equal monthly installments through bank draft in favour of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Patna.

¶16

The aforesaid deposit will be subject to certificate proceeding but the same will not be treated as an admission of the petitioner against the claim of the informant.

¶17

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶18

Shageer/-

¶19

U T

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vashishth Narain and Bashisht Narain Vs The State Of Bihar

Yogendra Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Dubey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jata Thakur and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lal Saheb Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shankar Thakur and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar