Allowed

Suresh Dubey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC9 Oct 2015CR. MISC./38242/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a supplier of paddy facing allegations under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, subject to his surrender and deposit of 20% of the alleged due amount within four months.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail for five months granted upon surrender within 12 weeks and deposit of 20% of alleged dues.

Suresh Dubey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38242 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2015 Thana -CHENARI District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== 1. Suresh Dubey Son of Late Ram Bachan Dubey resident of VillageChandra Kaithi, P.O.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Manager, Bihar Food Corporation, Sasaram, Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Sufiyan (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

4 09-10-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶4

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

The matter was adjourned since F.I.R was not very specific with regard to the quantum of paddy supplied and the CMR supplied by the petitioner.

¶6

On instruction, Mr. Gopal Krishna, learned counsel for the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation submits that petitioner was supplied 1700 quintals of paddy by the Sasaram unit of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited under agreement during the procurement years 2012-13, in lieu thereof the petitioner was supposed to

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38242 of 2015 (4) dt.09-10-2015

¶8

2/3

¶9

supply 1139 (67% of paddy supplied) quintals of Custom Milled Rice(CMR). The petitioner supplied only 538.50 quintals and failed to supply 650 quintals of Custom Milled Rice worth Rs. 13,00,418.78/-.

¶10

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was actually supplied 1300 quintals of paddy. Hence the entire calculation with regard to the paddy supplied and the due amount are absolutely misconceived.

¶11

However, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that petitioner is ready to deposit 20% of the alleged due amount within a period of four months in four equal monthly installments through bank draft in favour of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Patna. Though statement to that effect has not been made in the petition.

¶12

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for five months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class-cumAdditional Munsif-VII, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 70 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38242 of 2015 (4) dt.09-10-2015

¶14

3/3

¶15

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned Court below on deposit of 20% of the alleged due amount within a period of four months in four equal monthly installments through bank draft in favour of The Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Patna.

¶16

The aforesaid deposit will be subject to certificate proceeding but the same will not be treated as an admission of the petitioner against the claim of the informant.

¶17

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶18

Shageer/-

¶19

U T

Suresh Dubey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Dubey v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lalita Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hari Charan Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Vashishth Narain and Bashisht Narain Vs The State Of Bihar

Yogendra Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar