Allowed

Santu Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Oct 2015CR. MISC./40984/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted bail to five petitioners charged with offences under Section 307 IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Petitioners were directed to be released on bond after completing six months in custody.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners may be released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties after completion of six months from the date of custody.

Santu Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40984 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2015 Thana -DIGHA District- PATNA

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Santu Rai, S/o Sri Bachhu Rai. 2. Mantu Rai, S/o Sri Bachhu Rai. 3. Kariman Rai, S/o Sri Bachhu Rai.

¶6

Dhunuk Rai, S/o Late Chandeshwar Rai. All are resident of village- Kurji Gate No.- 72, P.S.- Digha, Distt- Patna.

¶7

Manoj Rai, S/o Sri Gorakh Rai, R/v- Biscuit Factory Road, Nasariganj, P.S.- Danapur, Distt- Patna.

¶8

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan (App)

¶14

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 29-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code along with section 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶17

As per the prosecution story, the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the informant’s side and want to take possession of the land which belongs to informant by force.

¶18

It has been submitted of behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 5 are in custody since 01.07.2015 and petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are in custody since 25.06.2015

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40984 of 2015 (3) dt.29-10-2015 P2/2

¶20

respectively. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tempering with the evidence against these petitioners. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. There is proceeding under Section 107 Cr. P.C. pending between the parties. It is further submitted that the petitioners may be released after completion of six months in custody from 25.06.2015.

¶21

It has been submitted on behalf of the State and counsel for the informant that petitioners are named in the First Information Report. There are other criminal cases also against the petitioners.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioners may be released after completion of six months from the date of custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Md. Enam Khan, J.M. 1^st Class, Patna in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 63 of 2015.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

Saif/-

¶25

U T

Santu Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santu Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Prasad Kushwaha Vs The State Of Bihar

Saryug Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhash Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhote Saheb @ Chhotey Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray Vs The State Of Bihar