Allowed

Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Oct 2015CR. MISC./23441/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to a petitioner under हुड़, impersonating peace and security; the trial court directed the trial court to release the petitioner on bail. He was in custody for murder under IPC 302/34. The court allowed bail by permitting the petitioner to be on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of similar amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23441 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2012 Thana -RAJPUR District- EAST CHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray, Son of Sahdeo Rai, resident of village - Madhuaha Brit, P.S. Rajepur, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar No. III, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwary No.1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 29-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.08.2014 in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 82 of 2012 for the offences instituted under Sections 342,323 and 302/34 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 19.08.2012 at about 1.50 A.M. in the night, the informant alongwith his wife and other family members were sleeping in his house. At the same time, 4-5 unknown persons entered into his house. The informant awaken and saw that 4-5 unknown persons who have tied their mouth with cloth dragged the informant and his wife from their room and some of the miscreants assaulted to the informant with

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23441 of 2015 (4) dt.29-10-2015

¶4

2/3

¶5

fist and leg. The informant louded. In the meantime, the informant heard the sound of gun shot, and other family members of the informant also awoke. Then the miscreants trying to flee away. The informant and his other family members entered into the room and found that the wife of the informant Kiran Devi was lying on the bed and oozing of blood started from her head and she was found dead with gun shot injury. The miscreants who entered into the house of the informant tied to the informant near Banana tree and they shot dead to the wife of the informant.

¶6

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 30.08. 2014 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering with the evidence against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The informant of the present case has been made accused in the present case for committing murder of his wife. The name of the petitioner has figured in the confessional statement of the informant who was made accused in the present case. The said confessional statement is in paragraph no. 46 of the case diary where the informant has admitted his guilt and has alleged to have purchased one country made pistol and one cartridge from this petitioner for Rs. 2,000/-. Except for this, there is no other material for

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23441 of 2015 (4) dt.29-10-2015

¶8

3/3

¶9

implication of the petitioner in the present case. The house of the petitioner was searched but no incriminating article is said to have been recovered from his possession.

¶10

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has come in the confessional statement of the informant where the informant has accepted his guilt.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Sikrahana at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 82 of 2012.

¶12

U.K./U T

¶13

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghwendra Kumar Rai @ Raghwendra Kumar @ Raghwendra Kr. Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Prasad Kushwaha Vs The State Of Bihar

Saryug Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhash Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhote Saheb @ Chhotey Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar