Rajesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought confirmation of provisional anticipatory bail granted by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. Bench confirmed bail with condition to deposit Rs.1000/month for wife's benefit; default leads to bail cancellation.
What did the court decide?
Provisional anticipatory bail confirmed subject to deposit of Rs.1000/month and automatic cancellation of bail bond upon failure to deposit two consecutive instalments.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23505 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1897 Year- 2013 Thana -SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSIWAN ====================================================== Rajesh Singh son of Kamal Singh, Resident of Village Sundarpur, Police Station Barharia, District Siwan. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Gayatri Devi @ Pashpati Devi, wife of Rajesh Singh, D/o Hansnath Singh, Resident of village Rampur, P.O. Pratappur, P.S. Bankatha, District Deoria (U.P.) .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. J.K. Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
6 07-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2
- The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498(A), 406 and 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 1897 of 2013.
- It is submitted that the petitioner, a person of clean antecedents, has been falsely implicated. In any event he agrees to offer an amount of Rs.1000/- per month regularly for the benefit of the opposite party no.2
- Having regard to the entirety of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23505 of 2014 (6) dt.07-10-2015
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the provisional anticipatory bail granted by a Magistrate should be confirmed in the High Court.
Whether conditions for confirmation of anticipatory bail including monetary deposit are appropriate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJESH SINGH
- respondent
THE STATE OF BIHAR
- respondent
GAYATRI DEVI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court