Allowed

Md. Kyamuddin v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jan 2015CR. MISC./38990/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under sections 363 and 511 IPC. The petitioner, caught after an attempt to abduct a minor, contended the FIR was a concoction driven by a friendship-money dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to cooperation with the court below.

Md. Kyamuddin Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38990 of 2014

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2014 Thana -MASRAKH District- SARAN ====================================================== Md. Kyamuddin S/o Md. Islam Miyan, Resident of Village Gaura Hathsar, P.S. Marhowrah, District Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 14-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶4

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Mashrak P.S. Case No. 72 of 2014 registered for offences under sections 363 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Allegation has been made that the petitioner tried to take away the son of the victim but after hot chase the petitioner was caught along with the son of the victim.

¶6

The counsel for the petitioner submits, the real fact is that the informant and the petitioner are friends, working together in a Jute Mill at Surat. The petitioner had sent money to his family by the hand of the informant while he was returning his home but no such money was given by the informant to the family of the petitioner which led to filing of the present case. He further

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38990 of 2014 (2) dt.14-01-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

submits that it is completely a concocted case and the petitioner, having no criminal history, is in custody since 22^nd May 2014. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in connection with Mashrak P.S. Case No. 72 of 2014, subject to the condition that the petitioner would co-operate the proceeding of the court below.

¶10

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶11

Mahesh/-

¶12

U T

Md. Kyamuddin v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Kyamuddin v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gauri Shankar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Roushan Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Chandra Prakash Singh Vs The Bihar State Electricity Board Ors.

Arbind Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhumika @ Zahina Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Rai @ Niranjan Kr. Rai @ Niranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar